ECMAScript 6+ vs TypeScript
Gone are the days when developers wrote Frontend in "pure" JavaScript (up to ECMAScript 5). Everything changed with the release of ECMAScript 6 in 2015. This event has become truly significant in the global Frontend development. The previous 6 years before that, the language had hardly changed. A year earlier, in 2014, Microsoft published TypeScript 1.0 and provided built-in language support in its IDE VisualStudio 2013. In fact, TypeScript was officially released back in 2012 (version 0.8), however, it was not popular due to the almost complete lack of support from existing IDEs at that time.
It's been a long time since then. Both languages developed in parallel. In some ways they are similar, in some ways they are radically different. Each developer and each team is free to decide which one to use. In this article, we will try to find the points of intersection and divergence of these two languages and compare their approaches.
TypeScript typing will not be considered in this article, because it is obvious that ECMAScript does not have it, and there is nothing to compare here.
For the purity of the experiment, we will transpile the code into the good old ECMAScript 5. TypeScript, for convenience, let's take version 4.8.4 (this version is enough for the purposes of the article) and compile it with a native tsc
compiler. For ECMAScript, let's use the Babel
toolkit.
Variables declaration
Let's start with the simplest, with variables. In this part, both languages have identical syntax.
ECMAScript
let a = ""; const b = ""; var c = "";
// == babel == var a = ""; var b = ""; var c = "";
TypeScript
let a = ""; const b = ""; var c = "";
// == tsc == var a = ""; var b = ""; var c = "";
In both cases, after transpilation, the variables are reduced to the only possible way to declare variables in ECMAScript 5, via var.
However, we know that let and const differ from var in that their scope is limited by LexicalEnvironment.
Let's try to wrap the let variable in the simplest LexicalEnvironment - Block.
ECMAScript
{ let a = "1"; } a = "2";
// == babel == { var _a = "1"; // babel added the prefix "_" to the vriable, thus // separating if from the global variable "a" below } a = "2";
TypeScript
{ let a = "1"; } a = "2";
// == tsc == { var a = "1"; // tsc has not renamed the variable or otherwise isolated // it from the redefinition below. } a = "2";
As can be seen from the example, TypeScript did not take care of isolating the let variable in runtime in any way. In this part, the compiler relies entirely on the compile time exception. Does this mean that TypeScript is not safe in runtime in principle?
Let's take a look at the following example
ECMAScript
{ let a = "1"; setTimeout(() => { console.log(a); }, 0); } a = "2";
// == babel == { var _a = "1"; setTimeout(function () { console.log(_a); }, 0); } a = "2";
From the ECMAScript perspective, the variable is still "isolated" and there will be no redefinition.
TypeScript
{ let a = "1"; setTimeout(() => { console.log(a); }, 0); } a = "2";
// == tsc == { var a_1 = "1"; setTimeout(function () { console.log(a_1); }, 0); } a = "2";
In this case, TypeScript took into account the fact that the variable is accessed from a macrotask and took care of its isolation, similar to ECMAScript. From the developer's perspective, isolation is provided, but the issue of malicious actions from outside is still open. At least it's a little less secure than in the case of ECMAScript.
We are figured out with let, let's now look at const
ECMAScript
const b = "1"; b = "2";
// == babel == function _readOnlyError(name) { throw new TypeError('"' + name + '" is read-only'); } var b = "1"; "2", _readOnlyError("b");
Babel did not allow the constant to be redefined and returned an exception to the runtime.
TypeScript
const b = "1"; b = "2";
// == tsc == const b = "1"; b = "2";
TypeScript, as in the case of let, did not take care of protecting const in runtime, relying on a compilation error.
Arrow functions
Another innovation of ES6 is the arrow functions. They differ from the usual ones in the absence of their own context and a reference to arguments.
ECMAScript
const foo = () => { this.a = "1" }
// == babel == var _this = this; var foo = function foo() { _this.a = "1"; };
Here we see that Babel has replaced the reference to the function context, redirecting the call to the global context.
TypeScript
const foo = () => { this.a = "1" }
// == tsc == var _this = this; var foo = function foo() { _this.a = "1"; };
The tsc also acted in an absolutely identical way.
And what about the arguments array of the function?
ECMAScript
const foo = () => { console.log(arguments.length); }
// == babel == var _arguments = typeof arguments === "undefined" ? void 0 : arguments; var foo = function foo() { console.log(_arguments.length); };
Babel prudently checked whether there is a variable with that name in the global context, and if there is, it will return a reference to it. Otherwise, the array will be undefined.
TypeScript
const foo = () => { console.log(arguments.length); }
// == tsc == var foo = function () { console.log(arguments.length); };
In the case of TypeScript, a reference to arguments will lead to a real array of function arguments, an exception will happen only in compile time.
Классы
One of the most important innovations of ES6 were classes. Let's take a look at the simplest implementation of the class
ECMAScript
class A {}
// == babel == function _typeof(o) { "@babel/helpers - typeof"; return ( (_typeof = "function" == typeof Symbol && "symbol" == typeof Symbol.iterator ? function (o) { return typeof o; } : function (o) { return o && "function" == typeof Symbol && o.constructor === Symbol && o !== Symbol.prototype ? "symbol" : typeof o; }), _typeof(o) ); } function _defineProperties(target, props) { for (var i = 0; i < props.length; i++) { var descriptor = props[i]; descriptor.enumerable = descriptor.enumerable || false; descriptor.configurable = true; if ("value" in descriptor) descriptor.writable = true; Object.defineProperty(target, _toPropertyKey(descriptor.key), descriptor); } } function _createClass(Constructor, protoProps, staticProps) { if (protoProps) _defineProperties(Constructor.prototype, protoProps); if (staticProps) _defineProperties(Constructor, staticProps); Object.defineProperty(Constructor, "prototype", { writable: false }); return Constructor; } function _toPropertyKey(t) { var i = _toPrimitive(t, "string"); return "symbol" == _typeof(i) ? i : String(i); } function _toPrimitive(t, r) { if ("object" != _typeof(t) || !t) return t; var e = t[Symbol.toPrimitive]; if (void 0 !== e) { var i = e.call(t, r || "default"); if ("object" != _typeof(i)) return i; throw new TypeError("@@toPrimitive must return a primitive value."); } return ("string" === r ? String : Number)(t); } function _classCallCheck(instance, Constructor) { if (!(instance instanceof Constructor)) { throw new TypeError("Cannot call a class as a function"); } } var A = /*#__PURE__*/ _createClass(function A() { _classCallCheck(this, A); });
A simple declaration of a class, after transpilation by Babel means, leads to a rather bulky code in the form of a set of factories to provide the necessary level of security
TypeScript
class A {}
// == tsc == var A = /** @class */ (function () { function A() { } return A; }());
The same instruction in TypeScript creates just a few lines of code.
Let's add fields and methods to our class.
ECMAScript
class A { propA = "1"; #probB = "2"; methodC() {} #methodD() {} }
// == babel == function _typeof(o) { "@babel/helpers - typeof"; return ( (_typeof = "function" == typeof Symbol && "symbol" == typeof Symbol.iterator ? function (o) { return typeof o; } : function (o) { return o && "function" == typeof Symbol && o.constructor === Symbol && o !== Symbol.prototype ? "symbol" : typeof o; }), _typeof(o) ); } function _classCallCheck(instance, Constructor) { if (!(instance instanceof Constructor)) { throw new TypeError("Cannot call a class as a function"); } } function _defineProperties(target, props) { for (var i = 0; i < props.length; i++) { var descriptor = props[i]; descriptor.enumerable = descriptor.enumerable || false; descriptor.configurable = true; if ("value" in descriptor) descriptor.writable = true; Object.defineProperty(target, _toPropertyKey(descriptor.key), descriptor); } } function _createClass(Constructor, protoProps, staticProps) { if (protoProps) _defineProperties(Constructor.prototype, protoProps); if (staticProps) _defineProperties(Constructor, staticProps); Object.defineProperty(Constructor, "prototype", { writable: false }); return Constructor; } function _classPrivateMethodInitSpec(obj, privateSet) { _checkPrivateRedeclaration(obj, privateSet); privateSet.add(obj); } function _classPrivateFieldInitSpec(obj, privateMap, value) { _checkPrivateRedeclaration(obj, privateMap); privateMap.set(obj, value); } function _checkPrivateRedeclaration(obj, privateCollection) { if (privateCollection.has(obj)) { throw new TypeError( "Cannot initialize the same private elements twice on an object" ); } } function _defineProperty(obj, key, value) { key = _toPropertyKey(key); if (key in obj) { Object.defineProperty(obj, key, { value: value, enumerable: true, configurable: true, writable: true }); } else { obj[key] = value; } return obj; } function _toPropertyKey(t) { var i = _toPrimitive(t, "string"); return "symbol" == _typeof(i) ? i : String(i); } function _toPrimitive(t, r) { if ("object" != _typeof(t) || !t) return t; var e = t[Symbol.toPrimitive]; if (void 0 !== e) { var i = e.call(t, r || "default"); if ("object" != _typeof(i)) return i; throw new TypeError("@@toPrimitive must return a primitive value."); } return ("string" === r ? String : Number)(t); } var _propB = /*#__PURE__*/ new WeakMap(); var _methodD = /*#__PURE__*/ new WeakSet(); var A = /*#__PURE__*/ (function () { function A() { _classCallCheck(this, A); _classPrivateMethodInitSpec(this, _methodD); _defineProperty(this, "propA", "1"); _classPrivateFieldInitSpec(this, _propB, { writable: true, value: "2" }); } _createClass(A, [ { key: "methodC", value: // private function methodC() {} // private } ]); return A; })(); function _methodD2() {}
This class contains a public property, a private property, a public method, and a private method. Bebel placed private properties and methods in Weak collections. Public ones are configured using Object.defineProperty
.
TypeScript
class A { public propA = "1"; protected propB = "2"; private propC = "3"; public methodD() {} protected methodE() {} private methodF() {} }
// == tsc == var A = /** @class */ (function () { function A() { this.propA = "1"; this.propB = "2"; this.propC = "3"; } A.prototype.methodD = function () { }; A.prototype.methodE = function () { }; A.prototype.methodF = function () { }; return A; }());
Despite the fact that TypeScript has a slightly more flexible and more traditional object model, the resulting code is very primitive. Properties are simply placed in a functional context, and methods are placed in a prototype. There are no checks and configuration of properties and methods here, which allows us in runtime, for example, to access the protected property or call a private method from the child class
var __extends = (this && this.__extends) || (function () { var extendStatics = function (d, b) { extendStatics = Object.setPrototypeOf || ({ __proto__: [] } instanceof Array && function (d, b) { d.__proto__ = b; }) || function (d, b) { for (var p in b) if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(b, p)) d[p] = b[p]; }; return extendStatics(d, b); }; return function (d, b) { if (typeof b !== "function" && b !== null) throw new TypeError("Class extends value " + String(b) + " is not a constructor or null"); extendStatics(d, b); function __() { this.constructor = d; } d.prototype = b === null ? Object.create(b) : (__.prototype = b.prototype, new __()); }; })(); var A = /** @class */ (function () { function A() { this.propA = "1"; this.propB = "2"; this.propC = "3"; } A.prototype.methodD = function () { }; A.prototype.methodE = function () { }; A.prototype.methodF = function () { }; return A; }()); var B = /** @class */ (function (_super) { __extends(B, _super); function B() { return _super !== null && _super.apply(this, arguments) || this; } B.prototype.methodG = function () { this.methodF(); }; return B; }(A));
In the example above, class B actually has access to the parent's private method through its context reference.
Await/Async
The ES7 version introduced asynchronous await and async operators. Let's see how they work.
ECMAScript
async function foo() { await Promise.resolve(); }
// == babel == function _typeof(o) { "@babel/helpers - typeof"; return ( (_typeof = "function" == typeof Symbol && "symbol" == typeof Symbol.iterator ? function (o) { return typeof o; } : function (o) { return o && "function" == typeof Symbol && o.constructor === Symbol && o !== Symbol.prototype ? "symbol" : typeof o; }), _typeof(o) ); } function _regeneratorRuntime() { "use strict"; /*! regenerator-runtime -- Copyright (c) 2014-present, Facebook, Inc. -- license (MIT): https://github.com/facebook/regenerator/blob/main/LICENSE */ _regeneratorRuntime = function _regeneratorRuntime() { return e; }; var t, e = {}, r = Object.prototype, n = r.hasOwnProperty, o = Object.defineProperty || function (t, e, r) { t[e] = r.value; }, i = "function" == typeof Symbol ? Symbol : {}, a = i.iterator || "@@iterator", c = i.asyncIterator || "@@asyncIterator", u = i.toStringTag || "@@toStringTag"; function define(t, e, r) { return ( Object.defineProperty(t, e, { value: r, enumerable: !0, configurable: !0, writable: !0 }), t[e] ); } try { define({}, ""); } catch (t) { define = function define(t, e, r) { return (t[e] = r); }; } function wrap(t, e, r, n) { var i = e && e.prototype instanceof Generator ? e : Generator, a = Object.create(i.prototype), c = new Context(n || []); return o(a, "_invoke", { value: makeInvokeMethod(t, r, c) }), a; } function tryCatch(t, e, r) { try { return { type: "normal", arg: t.call(e, r) }; } catch (t) { return { type: "throw", arg: t }; } } e.wrap = wrap; var h = "suspendedStart", l = "suspendedYield", f = "executing", s = "completed", y = {}; function Generator() {} function GeneratorFunction() {} function GeneratorFunctionPrototype() {} var p = {}; define(p, a, function () { return this; }); var d = Object.getPrototypeOf, v = d && d(d(values([]))); v && v !== r && n.call(v, a) && (p = v); var g = (GeneratorFunctionPrototype.prototype = Generator.prototype = Object.create(p)); function defineIteratorMethods(t) { ["next", "throw", "return"].forEach(function (e) { define(t, e, function (t) { return this._invoke(e, t); }); }); } function AsyncIterator(t, e) { function invoke(r, o, i, a) { var c = tryCatch(t[r], t, o); if ("throw" !== c.type) { var u = c.arg, h = u.value; return h && "object" == _typeof(h) && n.call(h, "__await") ? e.resolve(h.__await).then( function (t) { invoke("next", t, i, a); }, function (t) { invoke("throw", t, i, a); } ) : e.resolve(h).then( function (t) { (u.value = t), i(u); }, function (t) { return invoke("throw", t, i, a); } ); } a(c.arg); } var r; o(this, "_invoke", { value: function value(t, n) { function callInvokeWithMethodAndArg() { return new e(function (e, r) { invoke(t, n, e, r); }); } return (r = r ? r.then(callInvokeWithMethodAndArg, callInvokeWithMethodAndArg) : callInvokeWithMethodAndArg()); } }); } function makeInvokeMethod(e, r, n) { var o = h; return function (i, a) { if (o === f) throw new Error("Generator is already running"); if (o === s) { if ("throw" === i) throw a; return { value: t, done: !0 }; } for (n.method = i, n.arg = a; ; ) { var c = n.delegate; if (c) { var u = maybeInvokeDelegate(c, n); if (u) { if (u === y) continue; return u; } } if ("next" === n.method) n.sent = n._sent = n.arg; else if ("throw" === n.method) { if (o === h) throw ((o = s), n.arg); n.dispatchException(n.arg); } else "return" === n.method && n.abrupt("return", n.arg); o = f; var p = tryCatch(e, r, n); if ("normal" === p.type) { if (((o = n.done ? s : l), p.arg === y)) continue; return { value: p.arg, done: n.done }; } "throw" === p.type && ((o = s), (n.method = "throw"), (n.arg = p.arg)); } }; } function maybeInvokeDelegate(e, r) { var n = r.method, o = e.iterator[n]; if (o === t) return ( (r.delegate = null), ("throw" === n && e.iterator.return && ((r.method = "return"), (r.arg = t), maybeInvokeDelegate(e, r), "throw" === r.method)) || ("return" !== n && ((r.method = "throw"), (r.arg = new TypeError( "The iterator does not provide a '" + n + "' method" )))), y ); var i = tryCatch(o, e.iterator, r.arg); if ("throw" === i.type) return (r.method = "throw"), (r.arg = i.arg), (r.delegate = null), y; var a = i.arg; return a ? a.done ? ((r[e.resultName] = a.value), (r.next = e.nextLoc), "return" !== r.method && ((r.method = "next"), (r.arg = t)), (r.delegate = null), y) : a : ((r.method = "throw"), (r.arg = new TypeError("iterator result is not an object")), (r.delegate = null), y); } function pushTryEntry(t) { var e = { tryLoc: t[0] }; 1 in t && (e.catchLoc = t[1]), 2 in t && ((e.finallyLoc = t[2]), (e.afterLoc = t[3])), this.tryEntries.push(e); } function resetTryEntry(t) { var e = t.completion || {}; (e.type = "normal"), delete e.arg, (t.completion = e); } function Context(t) { (this.tryEntries = [{ tryLoc: "root" }]), t.forEach(pushTryEntry, this), this.reset(!0); } function values(e) { if (e || "" === e) { var r = e[a]; if (r) return r.call(e); if ("function" == typeof e.next) return e; if (!isNaN(e.length)) { var o = -1, i = function next() { for (; ++o < e.length; ) if (n.call(e, o)) return (next.value = e[o]), (next.done = !1), next; return (next.value = t), (next.done = !0), next; }; return (i.next = i); } } throw new TypeError(_typeof(e) + " is not iterable"); } return ( (GeneratorFunction.prototype = GeneratorFunctionPrototype), o(g, "constructor", { value: GeneratorFunctionPrototype, configurable: !0 }), o(GeneratorFunctionPrototype, "constructor", { value: GeneratorFunction, configurable: !0 }), (GeneratorFunction.displayName = define( GeneratorFunctionPrototype, u, "GeneratorFunction" )), (e.isGeneratorFunction = function (t) { var e = "function" == typeof t && t.constructor; return ( !!e && (e === GeneratorFunction || "GeneratorFunction" === (e.displayName || e.name)) ); }), (e.mark = function (t) { return ( Object.setPrototypeOf ? Object.setPrototypeOf(t, GeneratorFunctionPrototype) : ((t.__proto__ = GeneratorFunctionPrototype), define(t, u, "GeneratorFunction")), (t.prototype = Object.create(g)), t ); }), (e.awrap = function (t) { return { __await: t }; }), defineIteratorMethods(AsyncIterator.prototype), define(AsyncIterator.prototype, c, function () { return this; }), (e.AsyncIterator = AsyncIterator), (e.async = function (t, r, n, o, i) { void 0 === i && (i = Promise); var a = new AsyncIterator(wrap(t, r, n, o), i); return e.isGeneratorFunction(r) ? a : a.next().then(function (t) { return t.done ? t.value : a.next(); }); }), defineIteratorMethods(g), define(g, u, "Generator"), define(g, a, function () { return this; }), define(g, "toString", function () { return "[object Generator]"; }), (e.keys = function (t) { var e = Object(t), r = []; for (var n in e) r.push(n); return ( r.reverse(), function next() { for (; r.length; ) { var t = r.pop(); if (t in e) return (next.value = t), (next.done = !1), next; } return (next.done = !0), next; } ); }), (e.values = values), (Context.prototype = { constructor: Context, reset: function reset(e) { if ( ((this.prev = 0), (this.next = 0), (this.sent = this._sent = t), (this.done = !1), (this.delegate = null), (this.method = "next"), (this.arg = t), this.tryEntries.forEach(resetTryEntry), !e) ) for (var r in this) "t" === r.charAt(0) && n.call(this, r) && !isNaN(+r.slice(1)) && (this[r] = t); }, stop: function stop() { this.done = !0; var t = this.tryEntries[0].completion; if ("throw" === t.type) throw t.arg; return this.rval; }, dispatchException: function dispatchException(e) { if (this.done) throw e; var r = this; function handle(n, o) { return ( (a.type = "throw"), (a.arg = e), (r.next = n), o && ((r.method = "next"), (r.arg = t)), !!o ); } for (var o = this.tryEntries.length - 1; o >= 0; --o) { var i = this.tryEntries[o], a = i.completion; if ("root" === i.tryLoc) return handle("end"); if (i.tryLoc <= this.prev) { var c = n.call(i, "catchLoc"), u = n.call(i, "finallyLoc"); if (c && u) { if (this.prev < i.catchLoc) return handle(i.catchLoc, !0); if (this.prev < i.finallyLoc) return handle(i.finallyLoc); } else if (c) { if (this.prev < i.catchLoc) return handle(i.catchLoc, !0); } else { if (!u) throw new Error("try statement without catch or finally"); if (this.prev < i.finallyLoc) return handle(i.finallyLoc); } } } }, abrupt: function abrupt(t, e) { for (var r = this.tryEntries.length - 1; r >= 0; --r) { var o = this.tryEntries[r]; if ( o.tryLoc <= this.prev && n.call(o, "finallyLoc") && this.prev < o.finallyLoc ) { var i = o; break; } } i && ("break" === t || "continue" === t) && i.tryLoc <= e && e <= i.finallyLoc && (i = null); var a = i ? i.completion : {}; return ( (a.type = t), (a.arg = e), i ? ((this.method = "next"), (this.next = i.finallyLoc), y) : this.complete(a) ); }, complete: function complete(t, e) { if ("throw" === t.type) throw t.arg; return ( "break" === t.type || "continue" === t.type ? (this.next = t.arg) : "return" === t.type ? ((this.rval = this.arg = t.arg), (this.method = "return"), (this.next = "end")) : "normal" === t.type && e && (this.next = e), y ); }, finish: function finish(t) { for (var e = this.tryEntries.length - 1; e >= 0; --e) { var r = this.tryEntries[e]; if (r.finallyLoc === t) return this.complete(r.completion, r.afterLoc), resetTryEntry(r), y; } }, catch: function _catch(t) { for (var e = this.tryEntries.length - 1; e >= 0; --e) { var r = this.tryEntries[e]; if (r.tryLoc === t) { var n = r.completion; if ("throw" === n.type) { var o = n.arg; resetTryEntry(r); } return o; } } throw new Error("illegal catch attempt"); }, delegateYield: function delegateYield(e, r, n) { return ( (this.delegate = { iterator: values(e), resultName: r, nextLoc: n }), "next" === this.method && (this.arg = t), y ); } }), e ); } function asyncGeneratorStep(gen, resolve, reject, _next, _throw, key, arg) { try { var info = gen[key](arg); var value = info.value; } catch (error) { reject(error); return; } if (info.done) { resolve(value); } else { Promise.resolve(value).then(_next, _throw); } } function _asyncToGenerator(fn) { return function () { var self = this, args = arguments; return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) { var gen = fn.apply(self, args); function _next(value) { asyncGeneratorStep(gen, resolve, reject, _next, _throw, "next", value); } function _throw(err) { asyncGeneratorStep(gen, resolve, reject, _next, _throw, "throw", err); } _next(undefined); }); }; } function foo() { return _foo.apply(this, arguments); } function _foo() { _foo = _asyncToGenerator( /*#__PURE__*/ _regeneratorRuntime().mark(function _callee() { return _regeneratorRuntime().wrap(function _callee$(_context) { while (1) switch ((_context.prev = _context.next)) { case 0: _context.next = 2; return Promise.resolve(); case 2: case "end": return _context.stop(); } }, _callee); }) ); return _foo.apply(this, arguments); }
To implement such a seemingly simple construction, Babel implements a generator mechanism with a set of checks and settings, which leads to a final listing of 490 lines of code.
TypeScript
async function foo() { await Promise.resolve(); }
// == tsc == var __awaiter = (this && this.__awaiter) || function (thisArg, _arguments, P, generator) { function adopt(value) { return value instanceof P ? value : new P(function (resolve) { resolve(value); }); } return new (P || (P = Promise))(function (resolve, reject) { function fulfilled(value) { try { step(generator.next(value)); } catch (e) { reject(e); } } function rejected(value) { try { step(generator["throw"](value)); } catch (e) { reject(e); } } function step(result) { result.done ? resolve(result.value) : adopt(result.value).then(fulfilled, rejected); } step((generator = generator.apply(thisArg, _arguments || [])).next()); }); }; var __generator = (this && this.__generator) || function (thisArg, body) { var _ = { label: 0, sent: function() { if (t[0] & 1) throw t[1]; return t[1]; }, trys: [], ops: [] }, f, y, t, g; return g = { next: verb(0), "throw": verb(1), "return": verb(2) }, typeof Symbol === "function" && (g[Symbol.iterator] = function() { return this; }), g; function verb(n) { return function (v) { return step([n, v]); }; } function step(op) { if (f) throw new TypeError("Generator is already executing."); while (_) try { if (f = 1, y && (t = op[0] & 2 ? y["return"] : op[0] ? y["throw"] || ((t = y["return"]) && t.call(y), 0) : y.next) && !(t = t.call(y, op[1])).done) return t; if (y = 0, t) op = [op[0] & 2, t.value]; switch (op[0]) { case 0: case 1: t = op; break; case 4: _.label++; return { value: op[1], done: false }; case 5: _.label++; y = op[1]; op = [0]; continue; case 7: op = _.ops.pop(); _.trys.pop(); continue; default: if (!(t = _.trys, t = t.length > 0 && t[t.length - 1]) && (op[0] === 6 || op[0] === 2)) { _ = 0; continue; } if (op[0] === 3 && (!t || (op[1] > t[0] && op[1] < t[3]))) { _.label = op[1]; break; } if (op[0] === 6 && _.label < t[1]) { _.label = t[1]; t = op; break; } if (t && _.label < t[2]) { _.label = t[2]; _.ops.push(op); break; } if (t[2]) _.ops.pop(); _.trys.pop(); continue; } op = body.call(thisArg, _); } catch (e) { op = [6, e]; y = 0; } finally { f = t = 0; } if (op[0] & 5) throw op[1]; return { value: op[0] ? op[1] : void 0, done: true }; } }; function foo() { return __awaiter(this, void 0, void 0, function () { return __generator(this, function (_a) { switch (_a.label) { case 0: return [4 /*yield*/, Promise.resolve()]; case 1: _a.sent(); return [2 /*return*/]; } }); }); }
TypeScript also uses generators in this case, but the implementation is much simpler and the final listing is only 48 lines.
Spread operator
The Spread operator appeared in the ES9 version. Before that, traditionally, the Object.assign
method was used, if necessary, but with the advent of spread and rest operators, the code began to look something like this
ECMAScript
const a = {...({})}
// == babel == function _typeof(o) { "@babel/helpers - typeof"; return ( (_typeof = "function" == typeof Symbol && "symbol" == typeof Symbol.iterator ? function (o) { return typeof o; } : function (o) { return o && "function" == typeof Symbol && o.constructor === Symbol && o !== Symbol.prototype ? "symbol" : typeof o; }), _typeof(o) ); } function ownKeys(e, r) { var t = Object.keys(e); if (Object.getOwnPropertySymbols) { var o = Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(e); r && (o = o.filter(function (r) { return Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(e, r).enumerable; })), t.push.apply(t, o); } return t; } function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { _defineProperty(e, r, t[r]); }) : Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? Object.defineProperties(e, Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { Object.defineProperty(e, r, Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; } function _defineProperty(obj, key, value) { key = _toPropertyKey(key); if (key in obj) { Object.defineProperty(obj, key, { value: value, enumerable: true, configurable: true, writable: true }); } else { obj[key] = value; } return obj; } function _toPropertyKey(t) { var i = _toPrimitive(t, "string"); return "symbol" == _typeof(i) ? i : String(i); } function _toPrimitive(t, r) { if ("object" != _typeof(t) || !t) return t; var e = t[Symbol.toPrimitive]; if (void 0 !== e) { var i = e.call(t, r || "default"); if ("object" != _typeof(i)) return i; throw new TypeError("@@toPrimitive must return a primitive value."); } return ("string" === r ? String : Number)(t); } var a = _objectSpread({}, {});
In the case of Babel, the _objectSpread
function is created here, which traverses the object by its keys and clones the values.
TypeScript
const a = {...({})}
// == tsc == var __assign = (this && this.__assign) || function () { __assign = Object.assign || function(t) { for (var s, i = 1, n = arguments.length; i < n; i++) { s = arguments[i]; for (var p in s) if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(s, p)) t[p] = s[p]; } return t; }; return __assign.apply(this, arguments); }; var a = __assign({}, ({}));
TypeScript, on the other hand, tries to use the classic Object.assign
, and only if it is not in this environment, a simple algorithm for bypassing object keys is implemented.
Conclusion
The article provides a rather incomplete list of all the features and innovations in ECMAScript specification and TypeScript documentation. Here we have considered only those points where they may differ from the perspective of implementation.
In general, summarizing all of the above, ES6+ (in particular, implemented through the Babel parser) generates a relatively secure final code that is more resistant to development errors and malicious interference. However, the price for this is bulky structures and, as a result, the speed of generation.
TypeScript, in contrast, adheres to the validation approach at the compile time stage, i.e., code with errors, in theory, should not be compiled, or at least errors will be immediately reported. This allows you to omit all sorts of checks at the runtime level, which makes the final code much smaller and easier. However, there is always a quite tangible danger of unfair development (type-check
can be ignored) and malicious interference.
What is considered the best approach is a difficult question. Each developer and each team solves it independently, based on their own realities. Often, the decision is based on the functionality of the language. So, in addition to implementing the capabilities of the ECMAScript standard, TypeScript has great possibilities in terms of typing (actually, this is its direct purpose), which ES6+ lacks. This criterion is often enough to make a choice in his favor. On the other hand, this same advantage can often turn out to be a disadvantage, since it requires certain skills and competencies in the development team.
Meanwhile, both options were and remain in demand, and work on their improvement will continue further, making the life of a simple developer better.
EN - https://t.me/frontend_almanac
RU - https://t.me/frontend_almanac_ru
Русская версия: https://blog.frontend-almanac.ru/NES7Y8QUJq_